Position Matters! It isn’t enough to target page 1 on Google, top 3 is what counts!

mouse-click

As we do a lot of SEO work at Bloom we’re often asked to put together ROI forecasts against our SEO strategies. Inevitably this revolves around key phrase research and estimating traffic volumes that can be anticipated as rankings improve against those terms.

I thought it would be useful to share some factual observations around this based on real experience of our clients rankings on targeted key phrases and the corresponding click through rates and traffic volumes against these terms. Obviously my clients wouldn’t want this commercially sensitive information sharing with their competitors so I have had to remove the actual terms and any reference to a specific client but the data is real and hopefully of use to you next time you are trying a similar forecast.


Question 1: how does position affect click through rate? (organic position in the SERPS)

Taking a sample from a client where I have both the monthly impressions data from their PPC campaign against key phrases where they are ‘always on’ and comparing against their average organic SERPS position sampled twice weekly I was able to observe the following trends.

keyphrase-1-graph

Unfortunately I didn’t have the position data for Jan here but we can assume that it was closer to the position regained in June. The Peak CTR achieved was around 4% against and average position of 3.8.

keyphrase-2-graph

Here we can see a peak CTR of around 9% against an average position of 2, almost double the CTR for an average position 1.8 higher.

keyphrase-3-graph

Here we how dropping from a top position (average of 1.75) to an average of 4.5 only a few positions lower has a dramatic affect on CTR with the peak CTR of 21.61% dropping to 5.94% with the result only 3 places lower.

Unsurprisingly the impact on traffic can be seen clearly of this drop in position.

untitled

Looking at the data I can see that where a position average of 2 was held for a month the CTR hovers around the 10% mark, where we see an average position of 1.75 held for the month meaning that for some of the month the client was at number one for the term we see the CTR double a huge difference for just one position gained for a just a proportion of the month.

Question 2: So what! this is obvious isn’t it?

Of course the fact that the higher placed you are the more traffic you get didn’t come as a revelation to me however prior to carrying out this research I hadn’t realised just how much of an impact position 1-2 makes, here we can see:

Position 1 -20% CTR
Position 2 -10% CTR
Position 3 – 6% CTR
Position 4 – 5% CTR

The drop-off is markedly slower once we pass position 3.

I do have to point out the limitations of this of course.. 3 key phrases is hardly a representative sample however without using impressions data I have verified the same degree of impact on traffic seen here from other clients gaining top organic positions. Other factors such as whether they are running PPC, how well known the brand is, what the copy under the SERP actually says etc will all have an impact.

The most important learning for me is that easing off working on key phrases once you see them hit top 5 spots to work on others is a false economy, we operate a lot of payment on results contracts with our clients and looking at this data there is a clear incentive to both the client and agency to restructure these around the very top positions, yes it’s tough to get there and perhaps even tougher to stay there, but with the right agreement this would be workable. Inevitably it would cost more but the ROI would justify the spend.

Be Sociable, Share!
This entry was posted in Search & Social. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Position Matters! It isn’t enough to target page 1 on Google, top 3 is what counts!

  1. Hi Alex,

    This is a great post – as you point out while it’s not revolatory is great to see some actual proof of the points you’ve made rather than the usual hot air and ‘it’s true honest;y’ posts you see elsewhere.

    It will be interesting to see over the next couple of years how this is affected by more blended search results – or if engines such as Wolfram Alpha or Google Squared really take off – will we see a more even clickthrough down the first page? Or will people still hammer that first result?

  2. Tom says:

    Nice analysis Alex – one thing to control for which you may have missed, did you filter out traffic from google.com and google.co.uk? Impression data will give you those number combined but rankings can (and often are) different across the two.

    I’ve tried to do a little bit of analysis like this on google local CTR but never really got anything consistent, I might have to revisit that…

    • Tom! Whaaay!

      It would be great to see some collarborative analysis of this kind to be honest – good point about the blended impressions from .com and .co.uk. Could be a nice project for you and Alex to fill the rest of today with :P

    • Alex Craven says:

      Hi Tom,

      Hmm.. to be honest no i didn’t I’ll take a look at that and re run the figures.. interestingly assuming that on avegarge the positions were lower on google.com that would actually increase the CTR further when those impressions were removed.

      Anyway I’ll revisit and update this post!

      Cheers

      Alex

  3. Cherry Blossom Pi says:

    Hi Alex,

    It’s a very interesting post, thank you for sharing your data. I’ve really tried to get away from using predicted clicks because I just cannot find a source or reliable (even vaguely reliable) data for impressions/searches (other than Adwords impression data which we don’t always have).

    I currently rely mainly on the Google Keyword Tool but find actual clicks are never anywhere near those predicted using the suggested CTR’s above against search volume numbers.

    For what it’s worth, I take Exact match as the Match Type and then I divide the figure by 50% (I’m convincing myself that 50% comes from the content network). I’m scared to share these numbers with clients because if they get top 3 positions and their clicks do not match the traffic estimates they invariably complain I’ve done something wrong – rarely do they question the data provided by Google Tools :-( (

    If I come across a more reliable source I’ll be so excited I’ll tell everyone!

    bibi, cherryb

  4. Alex Craven says:

    Hi Cherryb,

    yes we pretty much do the same where we dont have impressions data from active PPC campaigns. I guess it is all about expectation management, under promise and over deliver and your cleints will be happy!

    Cheers
    Alex

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>